Guara is a steer system and not a keel supplement - it is too a wind self-steering system
First encounter with balsa rafts
When the spaniards met the Inca balsa rafts, they were surprised by the cargo they were able to carry - but too the fact, that those rafts were navigated without a rudder, but nevertheless
were able to go as close or better to the wind than the Spanish ships.
But how that technology worked is still today something of a mystery.
What subsequently is written is intended as a MANUAL for raft skippers - steering with Guaras = daggerboards
we have heard many names for that steer system: Guara - Vara - Barra sværd - stiksværd - sword - daggerboard - board of some sort - retractable keels - etc.
Two GLASS PLATE photos - showing some of the LAST balsas - 6 of nov. 1899Note that the second photo show TWO balsas - courtesy Brüning Museum, Lambayeque
A balsa raft = a Kon-tiki-raft is a raft of balsa-wood-logs with Guaras plunged-in (inserted) between the logs to control that leeway, as every sail-craft has. Guara, as I both have seen written as 'Huara' and 'Vara', is the accepted word for those boards in the family = daggerboards, centerboards, lee-boards, lifting keels, swinging swords - words as all are synonyms for nearly the same - retractable keels. The word Guara is not a Quechua word - it is told to come from a language nearer to Equator.
Guaras works in the combination of wind and sea only - speed to steer is not needed
Another interpretation is that 'guara' simply could be a bad spelling of the spanish word "vara" or "barra", as more or less is the same. The Spanish Vara and barra both hold the meaning: bar, stick, pole, rod - and that seems more in accordance with a seaman's vocabulario. But look in your own Spanish dictionary.
A new word come easily, when a scholar try to spell a word pronounced by a native seaman, as try to say 'uara..
That seems submitted the same interchange of sound as when the English word 'watchman' entered the Spanish vocabulario as 'guachiman' and 'sandwich' as 'sanguche'. Note that the Spaniards can't hear the difference between the letters 'V' and 'B'.
Of same pronounce-write reasons I have seen I have seen the spellings: Inca, Inka, Inga, Ynga and Ingar as synonyms for the same Quechua word.
A 'Guara-steering' I would simply translate to English as 'board-steering'.
This Guara-system has worked in hundreds of years, even if Thor Heyerdahl had to rediscover it.
Opposite the classic stern rudder as need streaming water to change direction of a boat - a sail powered Guara-raft can turn statically = on the site. Therefore Guaras both for and aft. To tell the truth, a static turn is not very important for the sailing people - when sailing.
The Guaras only need water and wind to act. The fundamental principle is a balancing of leeway aft in relation to leeway of for, when sailing with wind abeam.
a principal difference:
A rudder works only when sailing - pressing sidewarts on the streeming water.
When angled, the rudder need a firm hand on tiller.
A rudder-steered craft hoist the sail to gain speed - and then she is steered into the course.
A Guara-steered craft set the guaras for the course, hoist the sail - and then she turn herself and sail off directly on the course.
The curved yard is still seen on the above photos 70 years later - so that is probably not occasional
Note that the Guaras are concentrated as groups in both ends of the vessel - that we could interpret, as a Guara-raft don't need more keel in between
Drawing from Ecuador 1841
In South America the ship development was different.
They knew the dugouts and expanded canoes, as they used on the rainforest rivers, but not on their Pacific ocean. There they used other means. Their balsa wood is a wonderful material - the lightest wood in the world, and therefor instead of digging out the trunks, they tied more of them together and got a raft with a rather good carrying capacity - impossible to capsize and impossible to swamp.
A raft of trunks is a fine vessel as could have a long and fat central trunk as stem and keel, but equipped with sail they plunged in some boards between the trunks to obtain a more stable course.
Perhaps they with wind abeam tried to use a paddle oar on lee side to compensate wind on hut and hinder too much sidegliding or perhaps they had a board free to use. The result was that they discovered how to balance leeway of aft against leeway of for. They discovered the Guara-steering, but not the rudder.
They could sail over all the ocean with their heavy loaded, but slow moving crafts, and they were beating so effectively to the wind, that they without greater problems could return to their starting point.
There they were in their development when the Europeans came and took over the control. The Europeans recognized the men of the coast societies as efficient seamen and sailors, but they never understood how the Guaras worked.
For the Europeans the function of Guaras has been a mystery in hundreds of years: Their world far away simply hasn't understood how to use these daggerboards, but nevertheless the South Americans have used them daily on their ocean sailing rafts.
The conditions for any sail-powered vessel were always: LOW forward hydraulic resistance together with a HIGH lateral ditto
Guara steering - still something of a mystery
A first Guara explication
Balsa drawing from book of Ulloa 1748
The earliest technical description of the function of Guaras is given by the Spanish scientifics Jorge Juan and Antonio Ulloa as in 1736 were joining a French geodesic mission to west coast of South America.
The original Spanish version of their book is from 1748, can be found in Volumen I page 314-320
The digital extracts presented here are from the later English edition of 1772: page 181-183
Inside this English 500 pages book, the pages 183, 184 and 185 are giving an exact explication of the function of Guaras.
With the later Guara-troubles in mind it is rather interesting to read this early explication, observing that this knowledge could have saved many 20-century raft skippers from serious
pages from book of 1772 - highlighting the text about the Guaras
Transcript of page 182-183:
"Hitherto we have only mentioned the construction and the uses they are applied to; but the greatest
singularity of this floating vehicle is, that it sails, tacks, and works as well in contrary winds, as ships
with a keel, and makes very little lee-way. This advantage it derives from another method of steering
than by a rudder; namely by some boards, three or four yards in length, and half a yard in breadth, called Guaras,
which are placed vertically, both in the head and stern between the main beams, and by
thrusting some of these deep in the water, and raising others, they bear away, luff up, tack, lay to, and
perform all the other motions of a regular ship; an invention hitherto unknown to the more intelligent nations of Europe,
and of which even the indians know only the mechanism, their uncultivated minds having never examined into the rationale of it."
- - - -
Transcript of page 183-184: "Whence it follows, that a Guara being throwed down in the fore-part of the vessel must make her luff up; and by taking it out, she will bear away or fall off.
Likewise on a Guara's being throwed down at the stern, she will bear away and by taking it out of the water, the Balza will luff, or keep nearer to the wind.
Such is the method used by the indians in steering the Balzas, and sometimes they use five or six Guaras, to prevent the Balza from making lee-way, it being evident,
that the more they are under water, the greater resistance the side of the vessel meets with; the Guaras performing the office of lee boards, used in small vessels.
The method of steering by these Guaras is so easy and simple, that when once the Balza is put in her proper course, one only is made use of, raising or lowering it as accidents require, and
thus the Balza is always kept in her intended direktion."
The arrogant attitude expressed against the indians and their culture could be personal, it could be a common expression of an European culture regarding the indians as subhumans at their
service - or it could be deeply ironical against themself. The truth we see today, is that only few of the Europeans have understood the Guara-explication, and that a man as Thor Heyerdahl
needed to rediscover the phenomenon, even if he could have learned it in Guayaquil.
Thor Heyerdahl's investigation
When Thor Heyerdahl in his famous sailing lifted up a Guara for repair, he experienced that the raft changed direction. Without intentions, he changed the underwater hull.
This discovery caused a subsequent research. Thor Heyerdahl's explication is drawn up after consulting and experiments in the Balsa Raft Society in Guayaquil in Equador, and he furthermore
refer to publications of explorers as Humboldt in 1810 and Stevenson in 1825.
cite: "In 1953, Emilio Estrada of Guayaquil arranged for a small test raft to be constructed like the Kon-tiki, of nine balsa logs lashed together and covered by a bamboo deck. Likewise, for navigation, a square sail was hoisted on its usual bi-pod mast in native fashion, and similarly six Guaras were inserted
between the logs, two in the extreme bow and two in the stern. No paddles, rudder or steering-oar were carried on the raft, which was launched from the open coast of playas, Ecuador,
with a crew of four."
(ref. book: Kon-tiki, p.109).
With 12 sketches as cartoon-strip is demonstrated how a raft, equipped with square sail and Guaras mounted along the main trunk, will react on its Guaras under a static turn all the clock
Explication for the strip of sketches
If we want to change course, we have to lift out a Guara in that end, we want to go leeward.
Without hold in water this end will float away with the wind, while the rest of the Guaras will keep their hold in the water.
- and that was what Antonio Ulloa and Jorge Juan had explained 200 years earlier
Balanced leeway with a dinghy:
The experiment in Guayaquil was followed up in Denmark, where a common sail dinghy was equipped with two in-line Guaras /centerboards.
Cite from the book: "Sejlads på en anden måde"
"The new principle - the use of two 'swinging swords' - makes it possible to alter the pressure of the water from fore to aft under sailing. In other words to steer in this way, and when the vessel is put on course, maintain the course by equalizing the pressure of the water on the fore and aft of the vessel. The new construction works traditionally, so far that vessel and keel skeg works as they have always done."
bow-centerboard + a
fixed keel + aft-centerboard
cite-2: "As soon as the wind fills the sail, and the aft fin is lifted, the fore fin accordingly will be a falling center for the swinging of the stern until it stands up against the wind.
Contrary - if the aft fin is down, and the fore fin is lifted, then the stemn will swing into lee, and the wind will blow into the aft.
At any moment and from any position, the swinging can be brought at bay. In other words, the presure of the wind at the sail and the presure of the water on the hull and the keel can be
Research and test by Y.D.Stenild in Denmark 1986: "Sejlads på en anden måde" - ISBN 8774 661 159
Balanced side-sliding with a Catamaran
photo of Dirch with his DIPPING steer-paddle, sailing his catamaran on the Carnon River in Cornwall. > > >
Some pacific double canoes employ the same principle as the Guara-rafts - they are using a handheld paddle for steering. as Dirch explain: he is NOT TWISTING the steer oar, as they do on the Viking ships, the pacific sailors are holding their paddle on leeward side of one of the hulls, lowering or lifting it to BALANCE THE SIDE-SLIDING of aft-end in relation to for-end.
The paddle itself keep to the boat pressed by water - just as every lee-bord does.
This last example indicate, that it is the AFT Guara as is important. With the aft you can controll the pointing.
Under normal sailing ahead, the bow is rammed into the sea and therefor hindred in side-sliding. Why fore-end don't need any Guara, except for static turn.
That no Guaras needed in extreme for, seems in conformity with the old drawing of
The four testimonies - respectively from two rafts, a dinghy and a catamaran - show the same empirical result:
I): Jorge Juan and Antonio Ulloa describe this very exactly and too show us a drawing of a indigeneous raft.
II): Emilio Estrada placed his six Guaras as pairs along the central log, and when lifting up a Guara /centerboard for or aft, that end of his craft lost its hold in water and slided sidewards with the wind.
III): Stenild in the same way balanced a dinghy - extending the natural keel with a centerboard for, and one more aft - and then throw away the rudder.
Lifting or lowering the Guaras (in the centerboard-version) in bow and stern - the side-sliding was balanced.
IV): Dirch with his handheld paddle confirm the phenomenon, employing the same principle - balancing the side-sliding (without need to twist the paddle).
Asia: Guara steer system in Taiwan and Vietnam
under our way through an ocean of information, we have discovered that Guaras /daggerboard steering too is known in both the island of Taiwan and in area of Vietnam for use on their bamboo-
rafts - and both claim to have got the daggerbord-steering from China.
ref-1: Cheng Kung University: "A brief history of the Evolution of Taiwanese Rafts"
ref-2: UNESCO: "Asian shipbuilding technology"
The only reason why this papers got known by us is, that the author too has written in English language.
In none of the asian cases we have been able to decipher anything more around asian Guara-lore.
This references to Asian rafts we have got from the book of P.J.Capelotti: Sea Drift - ISBN 0-8135-2978-6.
There is no evidence as indicate that Guara-system has been known outside Asia and South America.
nevertheless in Africa, it seems as the egyptians before our Christian era used to dip their steer oar - and not turn it
Inevitable such information bring us to ponder over, if there had been Chinese contact across the Pacific Ocean prior to the famous admiral Zheng He who 1421 "discovered the world". We expect that china still keep documentation, as not has been translated and published in the western hemisphere around the voyage of their admiral then.
A helmsman can balance the side-sliding. Drifting a boat he always has known
The empirical theory of BALANCED side-sliding
We can make our raft point where we want by dipping the Guaras in AFT in balance with those FOR = We are controlling the leeway of both ends independently
Balance of side-sliding is a theory as seems serviceable in all cases and for every floating sail vessel - rafts as well as boats, monohulls and multihulls.
The four reports all explain, that on a vessel sailing with the wind comming in over the side (beam - broad or close reach), we can balance the leeway of bow and stern independtly, by
setting down Guaras.
Balancing the leeway between for and aft end is the way to control the pointing of our vessel.
Animation of a static turn - with wind abeam
If we lift the front Guaras, the wind will press on the vessel and slide the bow sideways, while the raft or the dinghy
is pivoting around the submerged aft Guaras as a hinge - the craft will turn until the stern is pointing against the wind. Then the craft is ready to hoist sail and sail off.
Otherwise, if we lift up the aft Guaras /daggerboard /centerboard, the stern will side-slide and the craft (here the dinghy) will now turn up her bow against the wind.
Of same reasons why a rudder is placed aft on the hull, the aft Guaras are the most useful for steering a raft: the bow is kept fixed by the bow-wave. Lifting the aft fin (Guara) the aft = the stern will gain more leeway by sliding away = the boat will luff up. Lowering the same aft fin will resist leeway (restrict sidewarts movement) and our craft will bear away.
The balanced leeway is the reason why the first observations 4-500 years ago of the manoeuvrability of balsa rafts all told us, that these South American balsa rafts were able to sail out in the morning and return to same site on the coast in the evening (what not always was possible for the European vessels). But how that steer-system worked, was not analyzed.
What the old croniclers neither told us was, that a balsa raft steered by Guaras in-line could have some difficulties running for the wind, if not plunging down suficient AFT Guaras. But that problem we know from our monohulls, that by running we must let the sail draw and not push against the hull. That theme we will treat in a separate chapter.
Examples of similar physic balances:
A balanced sidegliding isn't something special for South American rafts. We can see the same constalation balance of 3 forces on a schooner or
an eel-drifter, where we can influence on the sail direction (sidewarts) by adjusting the wind-press between mizzen and foresails.
There are hard-core sailors as declare, that they can sail their boat without a rudder - by 'playing' with their sails only.
On a steelyard scale we can tilt the lever as we will, by changing the load or move the load along.
That is a balance between 3 forces on same line.
And that is what we are doing on our craft.
Of course we know, that the expression 'IN-LINE' not is correct:
A scale is supported a little bit over the lever arm
- and the CE-center of a sail is a little to leeward side of the center line of the vessel, whereas the CLR a little to windward of a heeled sail craft.
- and that is exactly what make the things work.
A working method employing balanced side-sliding
An eel-drifter is a flat-bottomed fisher boat, as work drifting sideways, hauling a drag-net along the sea bottom.
Having more masts and sails, the trick is to control their drift balancing by their sails - as indicated earlier.
The same way of fishing: hauling a trawl along the bottom while drifting slowly sidewarts was too used in the shallow lagoons along the southern shore of the Baltic sea.
Three FACTS around balanced side-sliding:
A Guara-raft sails rudderless - simply because she has no rudder - and she abide the same rules as any other rudderless sailor on the sea -
Note: neither tack nor veer
Guara steered crafts can turn on the site without need for sail-speed nor headway
- and therefore we are neither talking tack nor veer -
they move their Guaras and adjust their sail - and simply turn
And this is all a skipper has to know to sail a Guara-Raft:
By use of the bow and stern Guaras, you can dominate the pointing of your vessel
- and if your sail (or sails) is adjusted for that pointing, you will sail -
another way to tell the same story
Rudder versus Guara
Because the bow under sailing is kept by the bow-wave, then a steer-Guara principally is placed where the rudder would have been placed: in aft end of the craft
- and where a rudder actively press the aft end up against the force of wind, there a Guara passively resist the winds press
Of that reason it is only rudder-steered crafts as distinguish between the manoeuvres: tack and veer - because the rudder need streaming water, else it will not work. The Guaras haven't this need.
Tack versus veer with a lonely sail on a lonely mast
If you choose to tack or to weer /wear is more a question of what rigging you have - and about sails for rafts we explain here. A "for and aft" rig will tack in a nice way, running the stem up in the wind and change over. Weering is more problematic because you have to gype /jibe = force your boom up against the wind and let it sweep over violently just over your head. A square sail rigged craft veer nice and safely, but can have difficulties under a tack to reach the winds eye, where you have to brace the yard over with the wind passing on wrong side of sail. That is a parallel problem to gybe.
Any of the two manoeuvres are easier and done more sure, if you have more sails to play with.
Nothing of this have much to do with rudder versus Guaras - only that a Guara craft not has to "run up" in the winds eye - she can turn statically.
But we agree that many skippers on mono-masted square sailers love to tack to demonstrate their competence as "master of the sea".
Square rigged raft work as Emilio Estrada show on his cartoon strip The tack Emilio Estrada illustrate with figure 9, 10 and 11. The wear /veer Estrada show with the figures 2 and 3. Veer is same manoeuvre as the tack, but now operating the Guaras in the other end of raft
I don't think that 'fore and aft' rigging was common in South America before the Spaniards came, but
we have seen several combined riggings among the replica rafts as have sailed out in the wake of
For Guara crafts the procedure is exactly the same for "for and aft" rig as for square sail rig: Set down the Guaras in the end where you want the pivot point, and the raft will begin turning. Then adjust your sail(s) for the new course and go back to your initial Guara setting. After that you should be sailing on the other tack with the wind from the other side.
The main difference to rudder steering is as named, that Guara steering don't need streaming water to turn a craft - that can be done 'on the site'.
For the Skipper as is planning more ahead and a level above
The WEATHERCOCK principle
With the common centre of the Guaras as pivot point your sail-vessel will blow to leeward
The common center of the Guaras make the hold in water - as the nail make the hold on wall
as well as you can hang a picture slant (in a gravitation field), you can point your craft /raft (in a wind field)! You decide the hanging point - or where the hold in the water shall be !
- and the gravitation - respectively the (Northern) wind will do the rest -
Weathercock raft with only four Guaras:
A raft with sail is out of control, until we plunge down a Guara/daggerboard
and here we will show what what a NORTHERN wind will do, if we plunge-down into the outermost cracks between trunks.
#1): with Guaras plunget in both aft corners and a northern wind blowing - the raft will react and pivot around the blue-star-marked point between the two Guaras while mast and sail drift leeward - ready to take off running with course against South.
#2): If we plunge in port Guaras both for and aft, the raft again will pivot around its new point between the two daggerboards and sail/mast go leeward - subsequent the raft will point against East with wind abeam on port side.
A side leap to Guara steering on oceangoing Catamarans.
#3, #4 and #5 show that with a Northern wind we wil have similar options for a Nord Western pointing. Each Guara will give a hold in water, but is too a waterbrake for headway.
What is best for actual raft in actuel situation skipper must find out.
#6): If we study the symmetry in our four Guara slots, the above examples show us, that we without greater problems can move or create pivot point all the way around the mast and all over the raft, as demonstrated by stars.
And still more Pivot points are possible, if some of the Guaras only are plunged in partial.
After setting the Guaras, the raft get hold in water and will turn just like a weather-cock around its pivot ready to go ahead on a new course, if the sail is adjusted for that.
After choosing your Guara-combination, a next step could be to adjust your sail for that pointing you have choosed - and then sail on.
You can control the pointing of our raft all the compass around - with Guaras alone - and you are not limited to use
Guaras along central trunk -
What the past generations tried to tell
A modern explication of
what the old South Americans did
A Guara steer-system work only with the combination of wind on sails against the hydraulic resistance of under-water body
The CE = Center of Winds Effort is on a square sail the center of the canvas
Guayaquil, Ecuador 1841 The drawing was made by the french lieutenant, later admiral François-Edmond Pâris is our technical most detailled of old sketches, and seen in the light of his later career we feel no reason to doubt of its reliability
The semicircle of CE = Center of Effort for a lonely square sail is transfered to the old drawing - and seems to pass just over the front Guara-group.
With reference to this old french drawing from 1841, we with three simple sketches can demonstrate, that what they did on a raft was to move the center of hydraulic resistance between for
That has as consequence, that the vessel will react as the rule says: the wind will blow and our craft will turn, until the centre of wind is directly downwind from the actual pivot-centre,
defined by the position of the Guaras - and we have got a new pointing.
The hold in water is normaly called CLR = Center of Lateral Resistance
In both the raft and the dinghy case named before, we were manipulating = changing the shape of the underwater body and in this way we controlled the position of Center of Hydraulic
Resistance - and with that the pointing of the vessel.
Nevertheless, the old French drawing give us more information. There are reasons to note the place of formost Guara-group is just in front of mast and not in the bow. That is a place as seems placed just under where the sail center CE can be moved in a half circle:
That place has as consequence that the Guaras front of mast not will contribute much to the pointing of the raft - they are to consider more as a keel-arrangement. On the other hand, the
need for front Guaras to steer isn't large, while a sailing ahead. The raft will ram her bow into the sea and side-sliding of bow will be hindered.
It is the aft Guaras as have the job to point the raft - and that is in full accordance with the theory expressed of 'balanced sidesliding'.
The common rule for any sail-vessel:
The wind will blow the vessel leeward of her hold in water! and thus define the pointing of the craft
- and that is what the greek deities Zephyr and Poseidon together try to explain here:
Seen in a cross view with wind abeam, it is easier to accept, that the Centre of Wind for sail /mast is clearly blown leeward of the Centre CLR of the
- and behold, a boat will heel the centre of wind more out, but a wide-beamed raft don't need to heel - and neither does.
sail dinghy with gaff rig
viking replica Kraka
with central Guaras
with windward placed Guaras
- but seeing the last rightmost picture of a raft, we could ask, what will happen if instead along the central trunk, the same Guaras was thrusted down in the outmost windward crack ?
- and the answer is, that just as a "weathercock" as well as any other wind-vane will stay more stable for gusts and waves and with less oscillation due to a larger distance from pivot point to the center of winds effort = from CLR to CE.
Thus, if you move your central placed Guaras out in windward crack you will gain stability - in the same way as a heeled monohull does
- and that is to compaire with a pendulum as in a longer string will swing slower
Take here the two lessons:
A): That is right, that more Guaras plunged in give more keel and theoretically less leeway - if you need that, - but Guara is a rather effective waterbrake for which reason more Guaras down too will give a loss in headway and weaken the sensibility of steering by Guaras. Therefor, if you can sail alone with your long straight side-trunk as keel and few Guaras down to steer - then do that.
B): Large distance from pivot point of weathercock to its centre of wind, do the same as large distance from the Hydraulic Centre of the Guaras to the centre of sails - that bring less swing and less oscillation of the weather-cock as well as less oscillation of the raft course when gusts and waves hit.
Don't forget that any sail powered craft on the ocean is alone subjugated wind and sea and nothing else - and of course both attack the craft in their own center of attack CLR and CE. The craft is virtually "suspended" between the forces working on those two centres CE and CLR.
this is why we call it the "Weathercock Principle":
the weathercock will always keep a stable pointing in relation to the wind - just as a Guara-steered raft can -
too many versus too few
Don't kill your Guara steering
Do as the old investigations indicate: plunge in a pair of Guaras in front end, and a pair more in aft end - and use those two most extreme pairs for steering.
If your raft is well trimmed - that will do it.
Note the observation from Dirch: when sailing ahead, only aft Guaras or dipping paddle is needed for steering.
Tangaroa 1965 passed the dangerous Tuamotu Archipelago of French Polynesia by employing 3 Guaras only. One in front - and two aft.
Guaras is a steer system and not a keel supplement
The "keel" of a raft is the long and straight side-trunk, as give the necesary high lateral hydraulic resistance.
If you absolutely want more keel to beat higher to the wind or something like that, then you could add a lee-board, a centerboard or a luffboard by plunging a board down in the steer-neutral midship zone in front of mast (just where the CE pass over in its orbit around the mast). First a luff-board before a center-board before a leeboard, because of the usefull stabilizing wind-vane-effect.
Then not more.
Around the many broken Guaras as we have heard about, then look at this proposal for flexible fixation:
One thing is Guara-slots, but DON'T fill up your raft-bottom with Guaras ! Any fin plunged down under a craft will of course reduce leeway, but TOO reduce headway. It is astonishing how much a surplus of long and deep fins as Guaras can brake the headway. The peril is, that you may "overkill" the steering, because too many Guaras plunged down will reduce the impact from your steer-Guara, reducing its influence on CLR = the common Center of Lateral Resistance.
And we suspect that phenomenon to be the killer of Kontiki2 expedition 2015. They couldn't steer their Guara rafts back to SouthAmerica and vanished in the South Pacific.
Hypothesis - as still miss empirical evidence:
Too many Guaras plunged in as keel-supplement will be a hindrance for steering - and an overcrowded beneath was the supposed killer of the Kontiki2 expedition of 2015 -
- a nice group of waterbrakes - as can't yield much steering
the crowded beneath of the Manteño raft 1996equipped with 24 Guaras (of which the half broke)
underneath Tangaroa2-2006 - no comments given
too many Guaras down may reduce the steering effect
Kontiki2: The many "Guaras" set down to give keel - OVERWHELMED the steering
If you overcrowd your raft bottom with many Guaras, you will reduce the sensibility of your particular steer-board - and may kill the steering.
- it is still the COMMON center CLR of all those Guaras, as decide and define the pointing -
Rudderless is a sport for the most hard-core
The rules for "rudderless sailing" is valid too for rafts
And don't forget, that an "emergency rudder" of a drogue in a bridle too work by move around the CLR
A rudderless sailor tilting his centerboard to move his hydraulic center more aft.
A raft is sailing "rudderless" - simply because she has no rudder - and the principles of "rudderless sailing" is a theme for much writing of books, manuals and at internet.
Link to some writings around rudderless sailing
The hull of the raft itself skipper has to accept with its strong and weak build-in qualities - but he can operate his Guaras and adjust the sail
The center of water resistance will under all the sailing be in balance with the forces from wind - in every moment. This balance is what define the pointing of the craft, which too means,
that the only way skipper has to correct the pointing of his Guara-raft is by changing the underwater-body = adjusting the Guaras - or move the center of sails, if rigging permit that.
A Guara-raft sails rudderless - simply because a raft has no rudder - and she abide the same rules as any other rudderless sailer on the sea
If you still are in doubt, what a rudderless sail craft can do - then ask a wind-surfer. He knows
Sailors in water (not wheeling on land or rail nor skating on ice) have to calculate with leeway
The inevitable Leeway
Wind abeam on a vessel give leeway, that know every seaman, and skipper has to calculate with leeway, as he only can escape when running downwind. That phenomenon is applied for every craft - perhaps with exception of submerged submarines,
The captain on the cruise liner know it, and that is why his ship is supplied with thrusters for and aft to compensate. Too the freight skipper know it. He has only one propeller and one rudder, and therefor he is very careful, when he is entering slowly in a narrow harbor entrance with the wind across. He probably will not do that without a tug-boat for assistance.
Rule for calculation:
The real course is the result of steered course with leeway added (whatever leeway is due to wind or current)
Sail-ships generally are trimmed for wind abeam, but as said: they can't escape leeway. In some special situations we directly make use of this broadside drift - as for example the eel-drifter as the name indicates work drifting sideways, or when a square sailor 'heave-to' - make use of her high lateral resistance to wait with sail hoisted - wait drifting slowly. -
Wind abeam is the "Mother of all leeway" - and that is why a sail-vessel always seems pointing higher to the wind than the true course.
When we are navigating a sail boat, we have to calculate with leeway, and the side-drift depends alone of the strength of wind and the area of sail and hull against the lateral Hydraulic Resistance.
The stronger the wind, the more leeway - and of course: more sail = more leeway. Leeway simply is a result of the wind's broadside forces against the Lateral Hydraulic Resistance of the hull.
Every sail-vessel should hold a LOW forward resistance, in combination with a HIGH lateral ditto - and wind abeam - in spite of the HIGH lateral water resistance - give leeway.
On a square-off raft the common expresions are a bit confused. On such a raft as sometimes use the one corner as stem, we could have doubt around where the vessel is "pointing" - along centerline or along the diagonal?
Nevertheless, a Guara-raft you can "point" as you will. If the sail is adjusted for diagonal sailing a skipper with a "square-off"-raft can sail along a diagonal, that is not the problem - but he still have to calculate with some leeway.
That confusion around "diagonal sailing" versus leeway seems a part of the problem on last raft raid 2015.
a pointed raft can sail on as pointing - along a centerline + with a few degrees of leeway
a square-off raft can sail along the diagonal + added the same few degrees of leeway but is loosing sail-speed crabbing half sideways
Well - if you understand the image as 4 individual rafts - yes - then they can sail in line
Well - if you understand the image as 4 individual rafts - yes - they can sail in line
Independent of pointing, wind abeam give leeway, and you will not be able to sail along a line
It seems as a logical consequence of the two first figures, that a Guara-raft should be able to adjust her pointing to be in accordance with her true course - but THAT IS WRONG! Skipper has to point his raft + and then add the leeway. Only by direct downwind sailing he can escape leeway.
Leeway is not directly influenced by the forward heading, because that is the effectiveness of the sail as have the task to split up the wind force in a lateral and a forward directed force, and then push with maximum force ahead against lowest resistance.
Indirectly a reefing or other reduction of sail reduce the force from wind - and thereby reduce both headway and leeway. But due to the wind on hull and hut is not reduced, the craft in her total get relative more leeway sailing reefed. And that statement has as consequence, that a big superstructure on a raft give a big leeway.
The challenge to find a LOWEST forward hydraulic resistance of a hull, was for example the main objective for the Norwegian tank test. - but they lost this advantage by confusion of what course they actually sailed - versus that course they thought they really pointed with their rafts.
Many types of vertical boards exist
The family of Guaras: Dagger-boards, centerboards and Lee-bords
Everybody can run a boat for the wind - and to sail with wind abeam is neither difficult
"The art of sailing is to beat close hauled to the wind"
That is what will classify to excellence the skill of skipper and his sailing craft
A leeboard explicationCE=Center of effort versus CLR=Center of Lateral Resistance
Leeboard - the family to Guara
The Guara /daggerboards was totally unknown for the Europeans. The fun is that similar system - as cousin to the Guaras - has been used several hundred of years in the northern Europa in the form of leeboards.
The Dutch did not invent leeboards. They saw them being used in the Far East during their discovery voyages in the early 1500s. In China they have a documented experience of more than one thousand years.
The result of this learning we saw on the Dutch rivers, canals and inland waterways, the German, Frisian and Waddensea coast up to South in Denmark.
All over, up and down the coast of East England, on the rivers Thames and Humber we had these 'daily work horses' in form of flat-bottomed and shallow drafted boats as Sloop, Barge, Keel, Ewer, Tjalk, Seascow, Botter, Kaag, Kahn, Evert, Curonian et cetera - all without a keel. Ewen far away, on all the shalow lagoons along the Baltic coast of Germany and Poland up to the Curonian lagoon between Lithuania and Kaliningrad, they sailed with their flat bottom and leeboards.
Even if they perhaps will do better with leeboard ALL the pictured flat-bottom vessels can beat against the wind.
In China they knew the Guara-steering - and from China came the lee-board to Europa - but the Guara-steering not
Song dynasty in China is Contemporary with the South American rafts
13 century junk drawn with two lee-boards
Thames barge resting by low tide
fore and aft rigged English Thames Barge
Humber Keel recognizable by its square sail
Curonian fishing boat showing her shallow draft
Danish Waddensea Evert will show her flat-bottom >>Mouse-over<<
Danish Evert landed in Waddensea
German flat-bottom resting on waddensea shore
Dutchman landed at a sunset shore
Dutch Lemsteraak showing how a luff board will heel out of water
With their HIGH lateral and LOW forward hydrauliv resistance, all the pictured vessels ware able to beat to the wind, even if some of them - but not all - did it better with lee-board
Unlike the Guaras, the leeboard is mounted outside the hull and normally one on each side - obvious for not to affect integrity of neither hull nor hold - and they are placed midship, very central on the side of the 'Center of Effort' of the sails, for not to disturb the effective trim of their crafts, as are steered by rudder.
LEEBOARDS were principally used to stabilize the course by reducing side-sliding of flat-bottomed sailboats, as couldn't have any natural keel - mainly because they needed to sail, land and beach in shallow waters or on riverbed by low tide. Up to one compass point = 6 degrees closer to the wind, than the same boat with leeboard up - is told us.
But the sailing people learned that leeboards could be a great help as pivot-point turning through the windeye under a tack. And with a leeboard hanging several feet below the ship-bottom, they had too a good sound-warning against banks and ground, when sailing in shallow waters.
Since the Danes more than 1000 years ago conquered Danelaw, the area around York (their Jorvik), the Viking's square sail had driven the boats on Humber River as 'Humber Keel'
The Humber Keel with her long and deep slap side was equipped with leeboard, but not because of need for keel - the slab side did it, and specially when loaded down. It did it too well, that she was difficult to turn in narrow waters. Therefor the main reason for leeboard was to get a turnpoint for the tack - and of course a sonic warning for low water, hanging one yard under the bottom.
The Humber Keel is well balanced and has her mast rather in front to match the forward moved CLR = Center of Water Resistance when sailing. The sideboard was as named mostly for turning purpose. Had the mast not been moved ahead, the sideboard had worked better behind the mast moving CLR backwards.
We have never heard of more leeboards mounted on same side; and therefor the Europeans never discovered the Guara steering qualities: to balance the side-sliding between for and aft - but in China they did.
Somewhere we found an old thumb-rule for dimensioning of leeboards, saying that the underwater size of this board should hold 3-5% of sail area - but saying nothing around shape, nor length nor breadth -
And the ship development went on
From leeboard to centerboard
The outside leeboards were used in centuries, until our evolution in ship-technology was able to construct safe and reliable wells inside a hull, what happend around 150 years ago. Then leeboards in some yacht-designs entered from both sides and joined in one single board in center - called centerboard of course - more as ONE adjustable keel and easier to handle than TWO leeboards on same boat. Later on the centerboard too was equipped with a counterweight.
Leeboards are hinged and centerboards too, whereas a daggerboard is a board pushed down in a sheath like a dagger, and has therefore to be of manageable size and weight - why only used in smaller sailvessels. Guara is mostly to compaire with a daggerboard.
Inside her well for living eels this eel-drifter has mounted a centerboard.
Neither here, we have never seen a boat with more than one centerboard - other than the trial-dinghy named.
The Incas' pay back to the viking replicas
To tilt the steer-oar is a trick as the vikingship sailors have forgot
Europa: The inca-contribution to the lost viking-lore
The rudder of a Viking-ship is a steer oar as is mounted in starboard side. Therefor the name starboard (DK: styrbord) is a viking conqueror's contribuition to the English language. The steer-oar had got her place on the starboard side of the vessel before the sail came to our rowing boats.
The Viking helmsman knows perfectly, that his ship with wind from port will heel and dip deeper its side-mounted steering oar as therefor react better - in contrast to a Starboard wind, as will lift the steer-oar more out of water.
The steer-oar on viking-ships is considered as a rudder, but due to its design and place, it too has some "dipping" qualities as the steer oar on the much earlier Pharaohnic Nile boats - in same way as the Guara it can be used to balance the sidesliding.
a Viking steer-oar, as we can tilt.
note that it reach rather deep down under keel
Viking ships too can tilt their steer-oar around the withy, and that they normally do in shallow water and when beaching. Laying the tiller down to lift the oar from the bottom - and then land on the beach. I have never heard that any viking replica have used their steer-oar to balance the side-sliding, Forgotten lore?
Tacking: change windward side
When changing leg every ship can either tack up through the wind-eye - or wear the other way around - turning her 'behind' against the wind - and which one of the two turns you should use, depend of your hull shape, rigging and sails.
Mono-masted square-sailors have no difficulties to wear, they turn as a cup on its saucer, but tacking through the wind-eye can give difficulties, if the vessel haven't sufficient headway in her run-up to reach the wind-eye. With no foresail and without streaming water around the steering oar the boat will be driven backwards again, and the manoeuver have to be repeated.
There are some small tricks:
1): On smaller boats, you can use an oar to row the boat through the eye.
2): You too can let some crew-members to go forward to weight down the bow of the craft. In this way they move forward the CLR = Center of Lateral Resistance as play together with the CE (center of effort) of sail as then may blow downwind, and bring the boat up in the wind eye.
3): Theoretically there is this third trick - a forgotten trick we could say - because I still never have seen it carried out:
Let the helmsman TILT the steer-oar out of water, because that too move the CLR forward and then the aft-end slides easier downwind (just as Dirch showed us at Carnon river) - and when in the wind-eye, swing over the yard, dip down your steer-oar again and sail-on on the other bow.
Nordlands boats are equiped with stern rudders, and therefor the learning process from the nordlandsboats back to the viking ships couldn't bring this learning.
Note: The same trick of moving the 'live ballast' of men forward, in some cases too can get the boat to beat higher to the wind - moving ahead the CLR.
Too yacht-skippers practising rudderless sailing use the same trick, to move around their living weight.
A side leap: It seems as the viking museums all around the viking's world owe us to verify, that the vikings really had ropewalks to disposition to justify their use of twisted ropes. Tvisted ropes is supposed to be an anachronism in the viking time - as well in Inca-time due to lack of ropewalk!
The missing art of heave-to
single masted square sailor 'heaved to'
Heave-to it is called = to bring a craft to stop with sails still hoisted, and under full control.
Out on the sea, any sail-craft can be stopped by turning her broad side against the sea and let the wind press the craft right up against the HIGH LATERAL hydraulic resistance to obtain a minimum drift
The heave-to maneuver you use to stop the boat - to wait for somebody or to pick something up.
In general the vessels keep their sail hoisted but without forward thrust, mainly to stabilize the boat and reduce the rolling caused by waves
- and with the sails adjusted to give no headway she lay without forward movement but drifting slowly sideways pressed by the wind.
The only thing skipper has to do is to keep the fore-end in balance with the aft-end across the wind.
For a rudder-steered vessel he is doing this by balancing with the sails (if he has more) but too playing with the rudder. With a guara steered craft he will use the Guaras to keep the same balance.
The manoeuver for a mono-masted square sailer as a viking ship is in general: tacking up in the wind eye, go through and get back-wind, and then - turn the rudder, but without brasing the yard - let the boat go astern until she stops with full back-wind in the sail - with yard still along and wind directly abeam. If the boat is well trimmed she will stay there, drifting slowly sidewards - HEAVED-TO. She will stay until skipper turn over the yard and sail-on.
If not trimmed, the boats with steering oar have the option to tilt her steer-oar and in this way change the underwater body and keep the balance with wind abeam.
As said: too the square-rigged Nordlandsboats can 'heave-to', even if they are equipped with stern rudder (pintle and gudgeon) and not a steering oar - but they need to be well trimmed. But of course here too a simple rowing oar too could help to keep the balance.
Two times Thor Heyerdahl had wanted to stop his Kon-Tiki, but they didn't know how to brake her.
First time was when Thor himself had sailed out in the rubber-dinghy without have it tied to Kon-Tiki - and second time when Herman Waltzinger fell overboard in his try to catch a blowing-away sleeping bag. Here it is the forgotten manouevre!
Having Guara-steering it is a rather easy manoeuvre: Plunge down the Guaras in both fore and aft end and - and in the same time brace the yard (square sail) along the centerline and across the wind. Then the wind will blow CE to lee of CLR and the raft will turn and stay broad side against the wind. All the winds force is now directed directly against the HIGH lateral resistance and the movement of the craft is therefore reduced drifting slowly sidewarts = heaved-to.
heave-to in wind force 6 - for man overboard recovery
Note that the two sails are counteracting to obtain no-headway
And here is at last what Heyerdahl wrote about Guara-steering
The Thor Heyerdahl's discovery of the Guara-steering
Cite from the Thor Heyerdahl book of 1948 (English version) - chapter V, Halfway: "The Kon-Tiki expedition by raft across the South Seas" - ISBN 978-1-4474-1141-3
Cite: We discovered the secret in the following manner. The wind was steady and the sea had gone down again, so that the Kon-Tiki had kept a steady course for a couple of days without our touching the lashed steering oar. We pushed the recovered centreboard down into the chink aft, and in a moment the Kon-Tiki altered course several degrees from west towards the north-west, and proceeded steadily and quietly on her new course.
If we pulled this centreboard up again the raft swung back on her previous course.
By simply raising and lowering the centreboard we could effect changes of course and keep to them
without touching the steer oar. This was the Incas' ingenious system. They had worked out a simple
system of balances by which the presure of the wind on the sail made the mast the fixed point. The
two arms were respectively the raft forward of and aft of the mast. If the aggregate centreboard surface aft was heavier, the stern swung freely round with the wind. The centreboards which are nearest the mast have of course least effect, on account of the relation between arm and power. If the wind was due astern the centreboards ceased to be effective, and it was impossible to keep the raft steady without continually working the steer oar. If the raft lay thus at full length, she was a little too long to ride the seas freely. And as the cabin door and the place where we had meals were on the starboard side, we allways took the seas on board on our port quarter.
We could certainly have continued our voyage by making the steerman stand and pull a centerboard up and down in a chink instead of hauling sidewise om the ropes of the steering oar, but we had now grown so accustomed to the steering oar that we just set a general course with the centreboards and preferred to steer with the oar.
Around Heyerdahl's later raids
Africa: An observation from Egyptian tombs and pyramids
Handling a Thor Heyerdahl theme, we inevitable - by the RA reed rafts - are brought in contact with the ship-lore of ancient Egypt.
Around Nile seafaring
The Nile river is and has allways been used for transport of goods along its length, and this natural and simple water transportation system grew a key element in the development of the ancient egyptian civilization, and was therefore too the base for development of water crafts - their boats.
As a natural navigation channel and river road along all Egypt, the Nile was favoured by wind and stream. The waterway is known for its special conditions: row and drift downwards with the current against North - and using the steady North or North-Eastern trade wind to thrust the boats upstream against South. And this phenomenon probably in some way has been determinant conditions for the creation of their early sail culture on Nile and Red Sea.
I have no idea if the model of origen for the reed rafts of Thor Heyerdahl was of same kind, but they doesn't look like the boats from the pyramid pictures, nevertheless his reed raft is told to come from the Upper Nile of Sudan. And his system of double steeroar looks like the oldtimers - but the steer oars at RA II are mounted with tillers as we can't see on the old paintings. Neverthemind - who knows - - - Heyerdahl too discovered his Guarasteering under his Kon-tiki raid - not before.
Thor Heyerdahl sailed mainly his reed rafts downwind when crossing the oceans - and with two steeroars aft, then he at least had moved backwards the CLR - and furthermore because the RA2-photo show the mast relatively ahead, then he cleverly too stabilized his sailing moving the windcenter CE ahead.
Perhaps if he had used the Pharaohnic principle with a short pool to sustain the shaft of his long steer-oar, Thor Heyerdahl navigating Kon-tiki in 1947 could have used less forces by dipping the same oar than to angel it, press it out of centerline, as he did. But he didn't know that then, because he had still not learned about the function of his Guaras.